Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan Job Portal Online Registration System

Appeals of Applicants for Various Posts

Sr.No	Applicant Name	Father Name / Husband Name	Post Title	Scrutiny Status	Appeal Date	Appellate committee Decision	Appellate committee Statement	Revised Eligibility	Revised Eligibility Statement	Action
1	Nayab Gul	Inam ullah	Professor of English	Eligible	2026-02-03	Accepted	Appeal Statement	--	--	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
2	MUHAMMAD BILAL AFRIDI	ZAHEEN MUHAMMAD	Assistant Professor of Pharmacy	Eligible	2026-02-04	Regretted	His appeals lack subjectivity thus cannot be considered	eligible	Appeal not considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
3	Naveed Rahman	Noor Rahman	Assistant Professor of Pharmacy	Ineligible	2026-02-04	Accepted	The Appellate Committee looked into his appeal and noted that since the applicant has provided a valid degree, he is eligible for the position.	eligible	Appeal accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
4	Haris Bilal	Alam Zeb	Assistant Professor of Food Science Technology	Eligible	2026-02-04	Regretted	The applicant claim for distinction marks for MPhil is not in line with relevant provision of the Statutes	eligible	Appeal not accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
5	Muhammd Bilal	Fazal Muhammad	Assistant Professor of Pharmacy	Eligible	2026-02-04	Regretted	In accordance with the terms of the appeal, the committee did not agree to the appellant’s request to include a new document for quantification at this stage, thus the appeal is not accepted.	eligible	Appeal cannot be considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
6	Muhammd Bilal	Fazal Muhammad	Assistant Professor of Pharmacy	Eligible	2026-02-04	Regretted	--	eligible	Appeal cannot be considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
7	Muhammd Bilal	Fazal Muhammad	Assistant Professor of Pharmacy	Eligible	2026-02-04	Regretted	--	eligible	Appeal cannot be considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
8	Muhammd Bilal	Fazal Muhammad	Assistant Professor of Pharmacy	Eligible	2026-02-04	Regretted	--	eligible	Appeal cannot be considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
9	Muhammd Bilal	Fazal Muhammad	Assistant Professor of Pharmacy	Eligible	2026-02-04	Regretted	--	eligible	Appeal cannot be considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
10	Shahzad Khan	Zar Gul Khan	Associate Professor of Marketing and Entrepreneurship	Eligible	2026-02-04	Accepted	• His claim for experience marks was accepted based on the documents provided with the appeal and the appellant is given 2 marks in experience. • Three articles published in the AWKUM journal "JBT" fall under Z category and are not applicable for BPS appointment as per HEC, having been published after June 2018. Regarding the claim of nine international articles, all were checked by QEC and declared “Not Verified”:	eligible	• His claim for experience marks was accepted based on the documents provided with the appeal and the appellant is given 2 marks in experience. • Three articles published in the AWKUM journal "JBT" fall under Z category and are not applicable for BPS appointment as per HEC, having been published after June 2018. Regarding the claim of nine international articles, all were checked by QEC and declared “Not Verified”:	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
11	Shahid Aziz	Aziz Nayab Khan	Assistant Professor of Biochemistry	Eligible	2026-02-04	Regretted	The project award letter and completion certificate are not provided	eligible	Appeal not based based on insufficient documents	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
12	Irfan Ullah	Mahmood	Assistant Professor of Biochemistry	Ineligible	2026-02-04	Accepted	Since the applicant mentioned the said experience and only failed to attach, the appeal is accepted	eligible	Appeal accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
13	Faiz Ullah Khan	Abdur Rahim	Assistant Professor of Pharmacy	Eligible	2026-02-04	Regretted	His appeal for marks in all three categories is based on submission of new documents, as all the claims in the appeal were not provided in his application form and thus not accepted.	eligible	Appeal cannot be considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
14	Shahid Ali Shah	Zar Wali Shah	Associate Professor of Biochemistry	Eligible	2026-02-04	Regretted	The committee noted that all his experiences have already been considered as valid by the Scrutiny Committee. Secondly, his claim of post-doc cannot be considered as he did not mention the same in experience.	eligible	Appeal cannot be considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
15	Kamil Hussain	Fazal Hussain	Assistant Professor of Human Resource Management	Eligible	2026-02-04	Accepted	In accordance with the terms of the appeal, the committee did not agree to the appellant’s request to include a new document for quantification at this stage, thus the appeal is not accepted.	eligible	Appeal cannot be considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
16	Aftab Alam	Abdul Hamid	Assistant Professor of Chemistry	Eligible	2026-02-04	Regretted	In accordance with the terms of the appeal, the committee did not agree to the appellant’s request to include a new document for quantification at this stage, thus the appeal is not accepted.	eligible	Appeal not accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
17	Kiran Shahjeer	Shahjeer Khan	Assistant Professor of Zoology	Eligible	2026-02-04	Regretted	The appellant has not objected to her quantification	eligible	Appeal not accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
18	Dr. Sadaf Aman	Rana Amanullah khan	Assistant Professor of Zoology	Eligible	2026-02-04	Accepted	Based on the documents attached with the appeal, his distinction marks are rectified to 5.	eligible	Appeal accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
19	Sajid Ur Rahman	Muhammad Ayan	Assistant Professor of Veterinary Sciences (Clinical Studies)	Ineligible	2026-02-05	Regretted	The Appellate committee looked into his appeal and noted that his PhD is in Preventive Veterinary Science. Thus, decision of the Scrutiny Committee is upheld	ineligible	Irrelevant qualification	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
20	Dr Muhammad Shah Faisal	Shah Ji Muhammad	Assistant Professor of Islamic Studies	Eligible	2026-02-05	Regretted	In accordance with the terms of the appeal, the committee did not agree to the appellant’s request to include a new document for quantification at this stage, thus the appeal is not accepted.	eligible	Appeal not accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
21	Naveed Rahman	Noor Rahman	Lecturer in Pharmacy	Eligible	2026-02-05	Regretted	--	--	--	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
22	Yaseen	Nasim khan	Assistant Professor of Zoology	Eligible	2026-02-05	Regretted	The appeal for inclusion of new document was not accepted by the Appellate Committee	eligible	Appeal not accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
23	SAIF ULLAH	dORAN GUL	Associate Professor of Biochemistry	Eligible	2026-02-05	Accepted	Since the appellant provided valid experience certificate for experience claimed at Serial 3 & 4 of his application, 2 marks shall be added to his experience.	eligible	Appeal accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
24	Muhammmad Amin Khan	Muhammad Zaman Khan	Assistant Professor of Zoology	Eligible	2026-02-05	Regretted	The appeal for inclusion of new document was not accepted by the Appellate Committee	eligible	Appeal not accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
25	Muhammmad Amin Khan	Muhammad Zaman Khan	Assistant Professor of Zoology	Eligible	2026-02-05	Regretted	--	eligible	Appeal not accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
26	Muhammmad Amin Khan	Muhammad Zaman Khan	Assistant Professor of Zoology	Eligible	2026-02-05	Regretted	--	eligible	Appeal not accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
27	Muhammmad Amin Khan	Muhammad Zaman Khan	Assistant Professor of Zoology	Eligible	2026-02-05	Regretted	--	eligible	Appeal not accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
28	Adil khaliq	Fazli khaliq	Assistant Professor of Pharmacy	Eligible	2026-02-05	Accepted	The appellant provided experience certificate of experience mentioned at Serial No. 2, which was not earlier attached, thus experience marks shall be awarded accordingly	eligible	Appeal accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
29	Mansoor Ullah	Hidayat Ullah	Associate Professor of Human Resource	Ineligible	2026-02-05	Regretted	Based on the discussion reflected above, it is noted that the documents and information submitted with the appeal were not part of the record at the time the case was examined by the Scrutiny Committee. As clearly stated in the terms and conditions of appeal, “Appeals shall be justified only on the basis of documents already submitted at the time of application. Candidates are strictly advised not to submit any new documents during the appeal process.” Since the scrutiny process is conducted on the basis of the record available at the prescribed time, the inclusion of additional documents at this stage cannot be entertained. Accordingly, the decision of the Scrutiny Committee is upheld.	ineligible	Short of required relevant experience & Incomplete application form	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
30	Saddam .	Imdad Khan	Assistant Professor of Medical Lab Technology (MLT)	Eligible	2026-02-05	Regretted	In accordance with the terms of the appeal, the committee did not agree to the appellant’s request to include a new document for quantification at this stage, thus the appeal is not accepted.	eligible	Appeal not accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
31	beenish khurshid	dr. Khurshid Anwar	Associate Professor of Biochemistry	Eligible	2026-02-05	Accepted	Based on the distinction marks submitted with the appeal, her distinction marks shall be revised to 5.	eligible	Appeal accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
32	beenish khurshid	dr. Khurshid Anwar	Assistant Professor of Chemistry	Eligible	2026-02-05	Accepted	Based on the distinction marks submitted with the appeal, her distinction marks shall be revised to 5.	eligible	Appeal accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
33	beenish khurshid	dr. Khurshid Anwar	Assistant Professor of Biochemistry	Eligible	2026-02-05	Accepted	Based on the distinction marks submitted with the appeal, her distinction marks shall be revised to 5.	eligible	Appeal accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
34	Zakir Ullah	Sher Ali Khan	Assistant Professor of Botany	Eligible	2026-02-05	Regretted	The committee noted that the appeal lacks subjectivity thus cannot be considered	eligible	Appeal cannot be considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
35	Muhammad Khan	Bahadar Khan	Associate Professor of Marketing and Entrepreneurship	Ineligible	2026-02-05	Regretted	The Appellate Committee looked into his appeal and noted that the terminal qualification of the appellant is not relevant to the advertised position. Thus, the decision of Scrutiny Committee is upheld	ineligible	The Appellate Committee looked into his appeal and noted that the terminal qualification of the appellant is not relevant to the advertised position. Thus, the decision of Scrutiny Committee is upheld	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
36	Muhammad Khan	Bahadar Khan	Assistant Professor of Marketing and Entrepreneurship	Ineligible	2026-02-05	Regretted	The Appellate Committee looked into his appeal and noted that the terminal qualification of the appellant is not relevant to the advertised position. Thus, the decision of Scrutiny Committee is upheld	ineligible	Irrelevant qualification	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
37	FAZAL RAZIQ	Ahmad Ali Shah	Assistant Professor of Chemistry	Eligible	2026-02-05	Accepted	In accordance with the terms of the appeal, the committee did not agree to the appellant’s request to include a new document for quantification at this stage, thus the appeal is not accepted.	eligible	Partially accepted by awarding him project marks	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
38	Zia ur Rehman Khalil	Inayat Khan Khalil	Assistant Professor of Veterinary Sciences (Livestock)	Eligible	2026-02-05	Regretted	The applicant claim for distinction marks for MPhil is not in line with relevant provision of the Statutes	eligible	Appeal cannot be considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
39	Sawar Khan	Sawab khan	Associate Professor of Zoology (Parasitology/Genetics)	Ineligible	2026-02-06	Accepted	The appellate committee looked into his appeal and noted that the appellant has also submitted an appeal in Assistant Professor of Zoology, wherein, he has been remarked as ineligible on the basis of qualification. Thus, the committee decided to refer his case to Scrutiny & Quantification Committee to review both his applications and determine his eligibility on the basis of his qualification and experience	eligible	The appellate committee looked into his appeal and noted that the appellant has also submitted an appeal in Assistant Professor of Zoology, wherein, he has been remarked as ineligible on the basis of qualification. Thus, the committee decided to refer his case to Scrutiny & Quantification Committee to review both his applications and determine his eligibility on the basis of his qualification and experience	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
40	Dr. Aamir Ali Khan	Nameer Khan	Assistant Professor of Medical Lab Technology (MLT)	Ineligible	2026-02-06	Accepted	The committee looked into his academic qualification and noted that his qualification is relevant to the advertised position. Thus, his appeal was accepted	eligible	Appeal accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
41	Nasir Mehmood Khan	Rast Baz Khan	Assistant Professor of Food Science Technology	Eligible	2026-02-06	Regretted	He has already been quantified for all his claims and got maximum marks in experience and publications	eligible	Appeal cannot be considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
42	Nabila Begum	Saifullah Khan	Assistant Professor of Food Science Technology	Eligible	2026-02-06	Accepted	The article "Nutritional composition, health benefit...." published in Frontiers in Nutrition is recognized as a W category journal, and the appeal is accepted. The applicant’s claim to add five new articles/documents is regretted.	eligible	Appeal partially accepted by adding 1 mark in publication	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
43	Sidra Pervez	Muhammad Pervez	Associate Professor of Marketing and Entrepreneurship	Ineligible	2026-02-06	Regretted	The Appellate committee looked into her appeal and noted that her PhD transcript mentions "Marketing" as field of specialization. However, she is short of the required experience as per the advertised criteria.	ineligible	The committee noted that though the qualification of individual is relevant. However, she is short of the required experience	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
44	Irfan Ullah	Hukam Dad	Assistant Professor of Zoology	Ineligible	2026-02-06	Accepted	Given the relevancy of HEC submitted by the appellant with the appeal, his appeal is accepted	eligible	Appeal accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
45	Irfan Ullah	Hukam Dad	Associate Professor of Zoology (Parasitology/Genetics)	Ineligible	2026-02-06	Accepted	Given the relevancy of HEC submitted by the appellant with the appeal, his appeal is accepted and his case is referred to the Scrutiny & Quantification Committee for quantification	eligible	Given the relevancy of HEC submitted by the appellant with the appeal, his appeal is accepted and his case is referred to the Scrutiny & Quantification Committee for quantification	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
46	Asaad Salam Farooqi	Amjad Salam Farooqi	Assistant Professor of Human Resource Management	Ineligible	2026-02-06	Regretted	The Appellate Committee looked into his appeal and noted that the terminal qualification of the appellant is not relevant to the advertised position. Thus, the decision of Scrutiny Committee is upheld	ineligible	Irrelevant qualification	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
47	Muhammad Adil	gulzar Muhammad	Assistant Professor of Islamic Studies	Eligible	2026-02-06	Accepted	Based on the attached experience certificate, 4 marks shall be awarded to him in experience.	eligible	Appeal accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
48	Dr. Abid Ahmad	Mushtaq Ahmad	Associate Professor of Human Resource	Ineligible	2026-02-06	Accepted	The appellate committee looked into his experience and evaluated the same with the advertised criteria. Given his teaching experience in CECOS University, the committee accepted his appeal	eligible	Appeal accetped	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
49	Dr. Abid Ahmad	Mushtaq Ahmad	Professor of Human Resource Management	Ineligible	2026-02-06	Accepted	The appellate committee looked into his experience and evaluated the same with the advertised criteria. Given his teaching experience in CECOS University, the committee accepted his appeal and referred the case to Scrutiny & Quantification Committee for quantification	eligible	The appellate committee looked into his experience and evaluated the same with the advertised criteria. Given his teaching experience in CECOS University, the committee accepted his appeal and referred the case to Scrutiny & Quantification Committee for quantification	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
50	SHAH ZEB	NOOR BAKHT ALI SHAH	Assistant Professor of Chemistry	Eligible	2026-02-06	Regretted	The Appellate Committee noted that the claimed project neither mentions project amount nor him as PI. Furthermore, the appellant has not attached any documents with the appeal	eligible	Appeal not considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
51	Sawar Khan	Sawab khan	Assistant Professor of Zoology	Ineligible	2026-02-06	Accepted	The appellate committee looked into his appeal and noted that the appellant has also submitted an appeal in Assistant Professor of Zoology, wherein, he has been remarked as ineligible on the basis of qualification. Thus, the committee decided to refer his case to Scrutiny & Quantification Committee to review both his applications and determine his eligibility on the basis of his qualification and experience	eligible	The appellate committee looked into his appeal and noted that the appellant has also submitted an appeal in Assistant Professor of Zoology, wherein, he has been remarked as ineligible on the basis of qualification. Thus, the committee decided to refer his case to Scrutiny & Quantification Committee to review both his applications and determine his eligibility on the basis of his qualification and experience	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
52	Shahid Ali	Frhad Ali	Assistant Professor of Human Resource Management	Eligible	2026-02-06	Regretted	The appellant claim for experience marks is not justified as the claimed experience is not relevant as per the advertised criteria.	eligible	Appeal not considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
53	Inayat Ur Rehman	saif Ur Rehman	Associate Professor of Pharmacy	Eligible	2026-02-06	Accepted	The attached project document shall be is accepted and marks awarded accordingly	eligible	Appeal accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
54	Abdul Qadeer	Abdul Munir	Assistant Professor of Veterinary Sciences (Clinical Studies)	Ineligible	2026-02-06	Regretted	The Appellate committee looked into his appeal and noted that his PhD is in Preventive Veterinary Science. Thus, decision of the Scrutiny Committee is upheld	ineligible	Irrelevant qualification	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
55	Muhammad Ilyas	Hamid Khan	Associate Professor of Accounting and Finance	Eligible	2026-02-06	Regretted	His claim for additional experience marks for experience claimed at ICMS was not acceded to by the committee as the same does not qualify as valid experience as per advertised criteria	eligible	His claim for additional experience marks for experience claimed at ICMS was not acceded to by the committee as the same does not qualify as valid experience as per advertised criteria	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
56	Muhammad Ilyas	Hamid Khan	Professor of Accounting and Finance	Eligible	2026-02-06	Regretted	The Appellate Committee noted that the applicant had been made conditionally eligible, subject to verification of his claimed experience at ICMS. As this experience has not been verified, the condition of eligibility is not met, and the applicant is therefore ineligible for the position of Professor.	ineligible	The applicant stands ineligible for the post of Professor based on advertised criteria.	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
57	Saif Ullah	Adil Muhammad Khan	Assistant Professor of Islamic Studies	Eligible	2026-02-06	Regretted	His experience marks were found correct as per application form.	eligible	Appeal not accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
58	Nadia Khan	Zamir gul	Assistant Professor of Chemistry	Eligible	2026-02-07	Regretted	In accordance with the terms of the appeal, the committee did not agree to the appellant’s request to include a new document for quantification at this stage, thus the appeal is not accepted.	eligible	Appeal not accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
59	DR. FAZLI HADI	GHULAM RABBANI	Assistant Professor of Pharmacy	Eligible	2026-02-07	Regretted	The claimed article is not recognized in HJRS 2022-23 – appeal cannot be considered.	eligible	Appeal not accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
60	Dr Asif Jan	Malang Jan	Assistant Professor of Pharmacy	Eligible	2026-02-07	Regretted	The claimed experience is not relevant to teaching Pharmacy thus not counted	eligible	Appeal not accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
61	Dr. Mohammad Daud Ali	Ali Khan	Associate Professor of Human Resource	Eligible	2026-02-07	Accepted	“Based on re-evaluation by the Director QEC, two (2) marks shall be added to his publication score. The project marks, however, are provisional and subject to re-verification.	eligible	“Based on re-evaluation by the Director QEC, two (2) marks shall be added to his publication score. The project marks, however, are provisional and subject to re-verification.	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
62	Dr. Mohammad Daud Ali	Ali Khan	Professor of Human Resource Management	Eligible	2026-02-07	Accepted	“Based on re-evaluation by the Director QEC, two (2) marks shall be added to his publication score. The project marks, however, are provisional and subject to re-verification.	eligible	“Based on re-evaluation by the Director QEC, two (2) marks shall be added to his publication score. The project marks, however, are provisional and subject to re-verification.	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
63	Naveed Khan	Shah Sultan	Associate Professor of Biotechnology	Eligible	2026-02-07	Regretted	His appeal for being declared eligible on the basis of post-PhD experience while also seeking additional marks for pre-PhD experience was discussed in detail by the Appellate Committee. The Committee, as a matter of principle, decided that the same category of experience used to determine eligibility shall be considered for the award of experience marks to ensure uniformity and avoid counting different categories of experience separately. Accordingly, the marks awarded to him under the experience category were found to be correct.	eligible	His appeal for being declared eligible on the basis of post-PhD experience while also seeking additional marks for pre-PhD experience was discussed in detail by the Appellate Committee. The Committee, as a matter of principle, decided that the same category of experience used to determine eligibility shall be considered for the award of experience marks to ensure uniformity and avoid counting different categories of experience separately. Accordingly, the marks awarded to him under the experience category were found to be correct.	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
64	Ome Aiman	Jamshed Khan	Assistant Professor of Zoology	Eligible	2026-02-07	Regretted	The appeal for inclusion of new document was not accepted by the Appellate Committee	eligible	Appeal cannot be considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
65	Brekhna Faheem	Fahim Akbar	Assistant Professor of Zoology	Eligible	2026-02-07	Regretted	The appeal for inclusion of new document was not accepted by the Appellate Committee	eligible	Appeal not considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
66	Naveed Khan	Shah Sultan	Associate Professor of Zoology (Parasitology/Genetics)	Eligible	2026-02-07	Regretted	His appeal for being declared eligible on the basis of post-PhD experience while also seeking additional marks for pre-PhD experience was discussed in detail by the Appellate Committee. The Committee, as a matter of principle, decided that the same category of experience used to determine eligibility shall be considered for the award of experience marks to ensure uniformity and avoid counting different categories of experience separately. Accordingly, the marks awarded to him under the experience category were found to be correct.	eligible	Appeal cannot be considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
67	Dr Iqbal Muhammad	Mumtaz Hussain	Assistant Professor of Medical Lab Technology (MLT)	Ineligible	2026-02-07	Regretted	The Appellate committee looked into his appeal and noted that his PhD is not relevant to Medical Lab Technology. Thus, decision of the Scrutiny Committee is upheld	ineligible	Irrelevant qualification	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
68	Dr. Mohammad Daud Ali	Ali Khan	Associate Professor of Marketing and Entrepreneurship	Ineligible	2026-02-07	Regretted	The Appellate committee looked into his appeal and noted that his PhD transcript mentions "Human Resource Management" as field of specialization. Thus, decision of the Scrutiny Committee is upheld.	ineligible	The Appellate committee looked into his appeal and noted that his PhD transcript mentions "Human Resource Management" as field of specialization. Thus, decision of the Scrutiny Committee is upheld.	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
69	Naveed ul Haq	Musharaf Din	Assistant Professor of Food Science Technology	Eligible	2026-02-07	Regretted	The experience claimed does not qualify as relevant experience as per the advertised criteria	eligible	Appeal cannot be considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
70	Zia ul islam	Aziz ur Rehamn	Associate Professor of Zoology (Parasitology/Genetics)	Ineligible	2026-02-07	Accepted	The appellate committee thoroughly reviewed the case and noted that his qualification is similar to that of Serial No. 18, thus the Appellate Committee accepted.	eligible	The appellate committee thoroughly reviewed the case and noted that his qualification is similar to that of Serial No. 18, thus the Appellate Committee accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
71	Dr.FarmanUllah	Nisar Mahmood	Assistant Professor of Veterinary Sciences (Livestock)	Eligible	2026-02-07	Regretted	The applicant has already been allotted maximum marks for experience	eligible	Appeal cannot be considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
72	Bahrawar Said	Gulab Said	Assistant Professor of Accounting and Finance	Eligible	2026-02-07	Regretted	In accordance with the terms of the appeal, the committee did not agree to the appellant’s request to include a new document for quantification at this stage, thus the appeal is not accepted.	eligible	Appeal not accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
73	Raees Khan	Sikhawat gul	Assistant Professor of Botany	Ineligible	2026-02-07	Regretted	The appeal is incomplete as no attachments are available with the appeal	ineligible	Incomplete application form	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
74	Raees Khan	Sikhawat gul	Assistant Professor of Botany	Ineligible	2026-02-07	Regretted	--	ineligible	Incomplete application form	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
75	Raees Khan	Sikhawat gul	Assistant Professor of Botany	Ineligible	2026-02-07	Regretted	--	ineligible	Incomplete application form	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
76	MUHAMMAD IBRAR	MUHAMMD IKRAM	Assistant Professor of Microbiology	Eligible	2026-02-07	Regretted	In accordance with the terms of the appeal, the committee did not agree to the appellant’s request to include a new document for quantification at this stage, thus the appeal is not accepted.	eligible	Appeal not considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
77	Rafiq Ahmad	Taj Gu; Muhammad	Assistant Professor of Microbiology	Eligible	2026-02-08	Accepted	Based on his appeal, he shall be awarded 4 marks for experience. i. The article “The structural, optical, and…” published in Inorganic chemistry communications which is HEC X category journal ii. The article “Psychogenetic, genetic and epigenetic…” published in Journal of Infection and Public Health, which is HEC W category journal iii. The article “Updates on Measles Incidence…” published in Medicina, which is HEC W category journal.	eligible	Appeal accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
78	Yasir Arafat	Karim Gul	Assistant Professor of Botany	Eligible	2026-02-08	Regretted	The appeal is not supported by valid award letter	eligible	Appeal not accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
79	Yasir Arafat	Karim Gul	Associate Professor of Botany	Eligible	2026-02-08	Regretted	The appeal is not supported by valid award letter	eligible	The appeal is not supported by valid award letter	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
80	Babar Iqbal	Muhammad Iqbal	Assistant Professor of Agronomy	Eligible	2026-02-08	Accepted	• The applicant didn’t claim any publication in his application form; thus, inclusion of new document cannot be accepted at this stage. • The project marks based on the revised documents is accepted and 10 marks awarded in project.	eligible	Appeal partially accepted to the extent of project marks	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
81	ABID JAN	Humayun Naz	Associate Professor of Biotechnology	Eligible	2026-02-08	Accepted	• The committee noted that he has been awarded 3 marks for First position in bachelor’s which stands in conformity with the Statutes. Since he has provided valid award letter and completion, he shall be awarded 3.098 marks in project. • The appeal regarding the article “Ellis-van Creveld Syndrome …” is accepted; the journal is W category as per JCR 2017. The appeal regarding the second paper is not accepted, as the article is not a peer-reviewed research article but a letter to the editor published in the journal.	eligible	• The committee noted that he has been awarded 3 marks for First position in bachelor’s which stands in conformity with the Statutes. Since he has provided valid award letter and completion, he shall be awarded 3.098 marks in project. • The appeal regarding the article “Ellis-van Creveld Syndrome …” is accepted; the journal is W category as per JCR 2017. The appeal regarding the second paper is not accepted, as the article is not a peer-reviewed research article but a letter to the editor published in the journal.	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
82	ABDULLAH	HAFIZ MUHAMMAD YAHYA	Assistant Professor of Islamic Studies	Eligible	2026-02-08	Regretted	The committee noted that the appeal lacks subjectivity thus cannot be considered	eligible	Appeal cannot be considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
83	Syed Sadaqat Shah	Syed Hikmat Shah	Assistant Professor of Botany	Eligible	2026-02-08	Accepted	• The academic score is provisional and are subject to verification by the Controller of the university concerned. • The article published in Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences is recognized in W category as per JCR 2017 and JCR 2018. Appeal accepted.	eligible	• The academic score is provisional and are subject to verification by the Controller of the university concerned. • The article published in Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences is recognized in W category as per JCR 2017 and JCR 2018. Appeal accepted.	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
84	Hamid Khan	Hastam Khan	Assistant Professor of Zoology	Ineligible	2026-02-08	Regretted	The Appellate committee looked into his appeal and noted that his PhD is in Biotechnology. Thus, decision of the Scrutiny Committee is upheld	ineligible	Irrelevant qualification	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
85	Dr.Naseeha bibi	jan muhammad/ imtiaz ahmad	Assistant Professor of Zoology	Eligible	2026-02-08	Regretted	The appellant has not objected to her quantification	eligible	Appeal not considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
86	ABID JAN	Humayun Naz	Associate Professor of Zoology (Parasitology/Genetics)	Eligible	2026-02-08	Accepted	• The committee noted that he has been awarded 3 marks for First position in bachelor’s which stands in conformity with the Statutes. Since he has provided valid award letter and completion, he shall be awarded 3.098 marks in project. • The appeal regarding the article “Ellis-van Creveld Syndrome …” is accepted; the journal is W category as per JCR 2017. The appeal regarding the second paper is not accepted, as the article is not a peer-reviewed research article but a letter to the editor published in the journal.	eligible	• The committee noted that he has been awarded 3 marks for First position in bachelor’s which stands in conformity with the Statutes. Since he has provided valid award letter and completion, he shall be awarded 3.098 marks in project. • The appeal regarding the article “Ellis-van Creveld Syndrome …” is accepted; the journal is W category as per JCR 2017. The appeal regarding the second paper is not accepted, as the article is not a peer-reviewed research article but a letter to the editor published in the journal.	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
87	Saimon Shahzad	Imam Ud din	Lecturer in Pharmacy	Eligible	2026-02-08	Regretted	--	--	--	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
88	Shafiq Ur Rehman	Altaf Ur rehman	Professor of Accounting and Finance	Eligible	2026-02-08	Accepted	His claim for experience marks cannot be considered as experience claimed at affiliated college doesn’t qualify as valid experience. The projects claimed are not research projects. Furthermore, as per re-evaluation by Director QEC, 2 marks shall be awarded to him in the publications.	eligible	Partially accepted for publications only and 2 marks awarded.	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
89	abdul jabbar	Sher zada	Assistant Professor of Veterinary Sciences (Livestock)	Eligible	2026-02-09	Accepted	The applicant’s appeal for two articles was considered. The first, “PUERARIN ATTENUATES THIRAM-INDUCED …” (Bulgarian Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 2025), is not under HJRS 2023–24 and not in WoS; appeal regretted. The second, “STUDY ON THE DECLINED POPULATION …” (International Journal of Biology and Biotechnology, HEC Y, link), is accepted.	eligible	Appeal partially accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
90	Sidra Hussan Saeed	hassan Saeed Ahmed Shah	Assistant Professor of Botany	Eligible	2026-02-09	Regretted	In accordance with the terms of the appeal, the committee did not agree to the appellant’s request to include a new document for quantification at this stage, thus the appeal is not accepted.	eligible	Appeal not accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
91	Abdur Rehman	Siddiq Akbar	Assistant Professor of Marketing and Entrepreneurship	Eligible	2026-02-09	Accepted	PCD number provided	eligible	Appeal accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
92	Salma Saeed Khan	Muhammad Saeed Khan (Late)	Assistant Professor of Biochemistry	Ineligible	2026-02-09	Accepted	Since the applicant mentioned the said experience and only failed to attach, the appeal is accepted.	eligible	Appeal accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
93	Sajjad zaheer	zaheer ullah	Assistant Professor of Agronomy	Eligible	2026-02-09	Regretted	The experience claimed is 6 years and the applicant has been awarded 6 marks accordingly. Furthermore 12 marks for research publications are granted to him as per verification of QEC	eligible	Appeal cannot be considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
94	Irfan Ullah	Awal Baz	Professor of English	Eligible	2026-02-09	Accepted	Based on re-verification by Director QEC, Articles mentioned at Serial No. 8 & 10 are in Y category journal, thus the same shall be added to his publication marks	eligible	Appeal accepted and publications marks rectified	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
95	Rukhsana Khatoon	Niaz Muhammad Khan	Assistant Professor of Zoology	Eligible	2026-02-09	Regretted	The appeal for inclusion of new document was not accepted by the Appellate Committee	eligible	Appeal not accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
96	Sajid Hussain	Amin ul Haq	Associate Professor of Pharmacy	Eligible	2026-02-09	Regretted	His academic marks were checked and were found correct	eligible	Appeal not accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
97	Sajid Hussain	Amin ul Haq	Assistant Professor of Pharmacy	Eligible	2026-02-09	Accepted	The academic score has been rightly calculated thus needs no change	eligible	Appeal cannot be accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
98	Hussain Ahmad	Ghulam Qadir	Assistant Professor of Microbiology	Eligible	2026-02-09	Accepted	• Based on the documents attached with the appeal, his distinction marks are rectified to 5. • His claim for research project does not qualify for marks as per the Statutes	eligible	Appeal partially accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
99	Dr. Muhammad Hamayun	Islam Nawaz	Assistant Professor of Human Resource Management	Ineligible	2026-02-09	Accepted	The Appellate Committee looked into his appeal and noted that the terminal qualification of the appellant is in Public Administration. Thus, the appeal is accepted subject to submission of relevancy certificate from HEC	eligible	Appeal accepted conditionally	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
100	Dr. Abdul Sajid	Abdul Ghani	Professor of Veterinary Sciences (Pathology)	Eligible	2026-02-09	Accepted	Based on re-evaluation by Director QEC, 2 marks shall be added to him in the publication’s category. Furthermore, his request for inclusion of new project document was not acceded to by the committee.	eligible	Appeal accepted to the extent of publications.	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
101	Farman Ullah	Sadiq ullah	Associate Professor of Pharmacy	Eligible	2026-02-09	Regretted	The applicant’s appeal for the article "Horizontal Transfer of Plasmid Mediated..." is regretted, as the journal is not listed in HJRS 2022-23.	eligible	Appeal not accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
102	Nasreen	Ghani Rehman	Assistant Professor of Zoology	Eligible	2026-02-09	Regretted	In accordance with the terms of the appeal, the committee did not agree to the appellant’s request to include a new document for quantification at this stage, thus the appeal is not accepted.	eligible	Appeal not accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
103	Nasreen	Ghani Rehman	Associate Professor of Zoology (Parasitology/Genetics)	Eligible	2026-02-09	Regretted	In accordance with the terms of the appeal, the committee did not agree to the appellant’s request to include a new document for quantification at this stage, thus the appeal is not accepted.	eligible	In accordance with the terms of the appeal, the committee did not agree to the appellant’s request to include a new document for quantification at this stage, thus the appeal is not accepted.	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
104	Nasreen	Ghani Rehman	Professor of Zoology	Eligible	2026-02-09	Regretted	In accordance with the terms of the appeal, the committee did not agree to the appellant’s request to include a new document for quantification at this stage, thus the appeal is not accepted.	eligible	Appeal not accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
105	FEAROZ KHAN	azim	Assistant Professor of Biochemistry	Eligible	2026-02-09	Regretted	The appeal for inclusion of new document was not accepted by the Appellate Committee	eligible	Appeal cannot be considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
106	SAIF ULLAH	dORAN GUL	Associate Professor of Biotechnology	Eligible	2026-02-09	Accepted	Since the appellant provided valid experience certificate for experience claimed at Serial 3 & 4 of his application, 2 marks shall be added to his experience. Furthermore, project marks are rectified accordingly.	eligible	Since the appellant provided valid experience certificate for experience claimed at Serial 3 & 4 of his application, 2 marks shall be added to his experience. Furthermore, project marks are rectified accordingly.	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
107	ISRAR KHAN	SHAH GULZAR	Assistant Professor of Islamic Studies	Eligible	2026-02-09	Regretted	In accordance with the terms of the appeal, the committee did not agree to the appellant’s request to include a new document for quantification at this stage, thus the appeal is not accepted.	eligible	Appeal not accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
108	Shafiullah	Nawab Khan	Assistant Professor of Zoology	Eligible	2026-02-09	Regretted	The experience claimed is working as Research Associate in a NRPU Research project, which doesn’t qualify as valid experience as per the advertised criteria	eligible	Appeal not considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
109	Dr. Mohib Ullah	Khalil Ullah	Associate Professor of Marketing and Entrepreneurship	Eligible	2026-02-09	Accepted	• His claim for experience is accepted. • The appeal regarding two publications in the International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change cannot be accepted as the exact date of publication cannot be verified from the PDF or online sources, and the journal has been derecognized w.e.f. June 24, 2021, due to involvement in dubious activities. Based on re-evaluation by QEC, the article published in the International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues is not available in HJRS 2020-21, and the article published in the Journal of Positive School Psychology is also not listed in HJRS 2020-21; both claims cannot be entertained.	eligible	His appeal is partially accepted to the extent of experience	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
110	Qudrat Ullah Khan	Usman Ghani	Assistant Professor of Chemistry	Eligible	2026-02-10	Accepted	The applicant submitted project completion certificates indicating a project duration from 01-04-2023 to 31-03-2025, with a total amount of RMB 50,000 (approximately PKR 2.25 million), duly supported by documentary evidence. The applicant’s role as Project Leader is reflected in both the original and translated documents. The certificate issuance date is 05-06-2025.	eligible	Appeal accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
111	Zamarud Shah	Zahir Shah	Associate Professor of Biotechnology	Eligible	2026-02-10	Regretted	His appeal for being declared eligible on the basis of post-PhD experience while also seeking additional marks for pre-PhD experience was discussed in detail by the Appellate Committee. The Committee, as a matter of principle, decided that the same category of experience used to determine eligibility shall be considered for the award of experience marks to ensure uniformity and avoid counting different categories of experience separately. Accordingly, the marks awarded to him under the experience category were found to be correct.	eligible	His appeal for being declared eligible on the basis of post-PhD experience while also seeking additional marks for pre-PhD experience was discussed in detail by the Appellate Committee. The Committee, as a matter of principle, decided that the same category of experience used to determine eligibility shall be considered for the award of experience marks to ensure uniformity and avoid counting different categories of experience separately. Accordingly, the marks awarded to him under the experience category were found to be correct.	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
112	Tauheed Ullah Khan	Hamid Ullah Jan Tabassum Marwat	Assistant Professor of Zoology	Eligible	2026-02-10	Regretted	The appeal for inclusion of new document was not accepted by the Appellate Committee	eligible	Appeal not considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
113	Ali Zeb	Dilawar Khan	Assistant Professor of Human Resource Management	Ineligible	2026-02-10	Accepted	Since the applicant mentioned the said experience and only failed to attach, the appeal is accepted	eligible	Appeal accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
114	Ashraf Ullah Khan	Nazir Ullah Khan	Assistant Professor of Pharmacy	Eligible	2026-02-10	Regretted	In accordance with the terms of the appeal, the committee did not agree to the appellant’s request to include a new document for quantification at this stage, thus the appeal is not accepted.	eligible	Appeal not accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
115	Ashraf Ullah Khan	Nazir Ullah Khan	Lecturer in Pharmacy	Eligible	2026-02-10	Regretted	--	--	--	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
116	SHAH ROZ KHAN	Yarmoz Khan	Assistant Professor of Microbiology	Ineligible	2026-02-10	Accepted	Since the applicant mentioned the said experience and only failed to attach, the appeal is accepted	eligible	Appeal partially accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
117	Shahzad Ali	Guldar Shah	Assistant Professor of Agronomy	Eligible	2026-02-10	Accepted	• The Appellate Committee noted that the applicant has served as Lecturer (BPS-18) at Hazara University from December 1, 2020, to June 6, 2022, and again from May 27, 2024, to October 1, 2025, possessing 2years 10months experience, hence 1 marks shall be added to the already granted experience marks. Based on documents provided with the appeal regarding project mentioned at Serial No. 3, 1.65 marks shall be added to him already granted project marks	eligible	Appeal accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
118	Dr. Farhan Ahmad Atif	Sheikh Maqbool Ahmad	Professor of Veterinary Sciences (Medicine)	Ineligible	2026-02-10	Accepted	The applicant claimed relevant experience at the time of application but did not provide valid certificates; a valid certificate has now been provided.	eligible	The applicant claimed relevant experience at the time of application but did not provide valid certificates; a valid certificate has now been provided.	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
119	Sadiq Shah	Mahabat Shah	Assistant Professor of Food Science Technology	Eligible	2026-02-10	Regretted	• His claim for additional 1 mark in experience for experience claimed in Pakia was evaluated by the committee and it was noted that the said experience doesn’t qualify as valid experience as per the advertised criteria. • For project marks, the said email shall be verified from the concerned university/awarding institute prior to awarding marks	eligible	• His claim for additional 1 mark in experience for experience claimed in Pakia was evaluated by the committee and it was noted that the said experience doesn’t qualify as valid experience as per the advertised criteria. • For project marks, the said email shall be verified from the concerned university/awarding institute prior to awarding marks	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
120	Naimat Ullah Khan	Sher Daraz Khan	Professor of Veterinary Sciences (Medicine)	Eligible	2026-02-10	Regretted	The claim of appellants is incorrect; the other candidate, Mr. Tariq Ali, he started his professional career in November 2003 whereas the appellant started his career in August 2004. Thus, marks have been awarded correctly	eligible	The claim of appellants is incorrect; the other candidate, Mr. Tariq Ali, he started his professional career in November 2003 whereas the appellant started his career in August 2004. Thus, marks have been awarded correctly	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
121	Dr. Shakir Ullah	Noor Hani Gul	Assistant Professor of English	Eligible	2026-02-10	Regretted	Though he claimed experience of 6 years, the experience certificate attached to the application and appeal mentions 5 years, thus marks are awarded correctly	eligible	Appeal cannot be considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
122	Zahir Shah	Gul Rang Shah	Associate Professor of Veterinary Sciences (Veterinary Surgery)	Eligible	2026-02-10	Regretted	Based on re-evaluation by the Director QEC, marks awarded to him in publication are correct and need no revision.	eligible	Appeal cannot be considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
123	Zahir Shah	Gul Rang Shah	Professor of Veterinary Sciences (Medicine)	Eligible	2026-02-10	Regretted	Based on re-evaluation by the Director QEC, marks awarded to him in publication are correct and need no revision.	eligible	Based on re-evaluation by the Director QEC, marks awarded to him in publication are correct and need no revision.	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
124	Dr. Naveed Farooq	Mr.Shah Farooq	Professor of Human Resource Management	Eligible	2026-02-10	Accepted	The applicant has not provided valid distinction certificate; thus, no marks can be awarded. Furthermore, since the experience claimed has been verified thus 2 marks shall be added to his experience marks	eligible	Appeal accepted to the extent of experience.	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
125	NAVEED UR REHMAN ANWAR	GHULAM RABBANI ANWAR	Assistant Professor of Architecture	Ineligible	2026-02-10	Regretted	The Appellate Committee has examined the appeal and noted that the Scrutiny Committee has rightly determined the candidate’s eligibility. In view of this, no interference is warranted, and the decision of the Scrutiny Committee is hereby upheld.	ineligible	His MS and PhD are not relevant to the advertised criteria. As per advertised criteria, the applicant shall have first professional degree (4 Years minimum, First Division) whereas the applicant has 2.68 CGPA, thus ineligible.	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
126	Fazal	Fazal Hadi	Assistant Professor of Agronomy	Eligible	2026-02-10	Regretted	• His academic marks were found correct as per application form. • Furthermore, his project doesn’t qualify as a research project	eligible	Appeal cannot be considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
127	Mujahid Shah	Khan Alam	Professor of English	Eligible	2026-02-10	Regretted	Scrutiny Committee decision upheld	eligible	--	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
128	Irfan Ullah	Awal Baz	Associate Professor of English	Eligible	2026-02-10	Accepted	Based on re-verification by Director QEC, Articles mentioned at Serial No. 8 & 10 are in Y category journal, thus the same shall be added to his publication marks	eligible	Appeal accepted and 2 marks for publications added	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
129	Muhammad Zakariya	Abdur Rasheed	Associate Professor of Islamic Studies	Eligible	2026-02-10	Regretted	In accordance with the terms of the appeal, the committee did not agree to the appellant’s request to include a new document for quantification at this stage, thus the appeal is not accepted.	eligible	Appeal not accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
130	Tariq Ali	Rahmat Ali	Professor of Veterinary Sciences (Medicine)	Eligible	2026-02-10	Regretted	In accordance with the terms of the appeal, the committee did not agree to the appellant’s request to include a new document for quantification at this stage, thus the appeal is not accepted.	eligible	Appeal not accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
131	Muhammad Zakariya	Abdur Rasheed	Assistant Professor of Islamic Studies	Eligible	2026-02-10	Accepted	In accordance with the terms of the appeal, the committee did not agree to the appellant’s request to include a new document for quantification at this stage, thus the appeal is not accepted.	eligible	Appeal not accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
132	Muhammad Kamran	Muhammad Khurshid	Assistant Professor of Islamic Studies	Eligible	2026-02-10	Accepted	• Based on the attached experience certificate, 4 marks shall be awarded to him in experience. • The articles "The View of Hanafi Jurists of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa..." and "Contribution of Mufti Muhammad Farid..." are in Y category, and the appeals are accepted. For "Municipality and Basic Needs", the details of author, journal, and DoP cannot be verified from the information provided by the applicant, thus the appeal is regretted. • Furthermore, his appeal for inclusion of new publications was regretted by the committee.	eligible	Appeal partially considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
133	mian inaam zeb	saran zeb mian	Lecturer in Pharmacy	Ineligible	2026-02-10	Regretted	Since the applicant did not provide any valid age relaxation certificate, thus decision of the Scrutiny Committee stands	ineligible	Since the applicant did not provide any valid age relaxation certificate, thus decision of the Scrutiny Committee stands	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
134	Abdur Rauf	yousaf Khan	Associate Professor of Botany	Eligible	2026-02-10	Accepted	The Experience claimed at Government Post-Graduate College shall be verified from the directorate and marks shall be awarded accordingly	eligible	The appeal is provisionally accepted, subject to verification of the claimed experience from the Directorate of Higher Education.	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
135	mian inaam zeb	saran zeb mian	Assistant Professor of Pharmacy	Eligible	2026-02-10	Regretted	In accordance with the terms of the appeal, the committee did not agree to the appellant’s request to include a new document for quantification at this stage, thus the appeal is not accepted.	eligible	Appeal not accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
136	QAMAR ULLAH	GUL JAMAL	Assistant Professor of Veterinary Sciences (Pathology)	Eligible	2026-02-10	Regretted	In accordance with the terms of the appeal, the committee did not agree to the appellant’s request to include a new document for quantification at this stage, thus the appeal is not accepted.	eligible	Appeal cannot be considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
137	Muhammad Siddiq	Rahim Zada	Lecturer in Pharmacy	Eligible	2026-02-10	Regretted	--	--	--	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
138	Dr Mohammad Naeem	HAJI ABDUL HAKEEM	Professor of Islamic Studies	Eligible	2026-02-10	Regretted	The applicant has already been allotted maximum marks for publications	eligible	Quantification unchanged	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
139	Ilyas	Shah Wazir Khan	Associate Professor of Biotechnology	Ineligible	2026-02-10	Accepted	Since the applicant mentioned the said experience and only failed to attach, the appeal is accepted	eligible	Since the applicant mentioned the said experience and only failed to attach, the appeal is accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
140	Kamran Khan	Muhammad Salih	Assistant Professor of Veterinary Sciences (Livestock)	Eligible	2026-02-10	Regretted	The applicant claim for distinction marks for MPhil is not in line with relevant provision of the Statutes	eligible	Appeal cannot be considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
141	Farooq Ahmad	Fazal Mola	Assistant Professor of Biochemistry	Eligible	2026-02-10	Regretted	The appeal for inclusion of new document was not accepted by the Appellate Committee	eligible	Appeal cannot be considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
142	Asad Ullah	Purdil Khan	Professor of Veterinary Sciences (Pathology)	Eligible	2026-02-10	Accepted	The applicant has not provided valid experience for the 3 months as Lecturer in The University of Agriculture, thus the same may be accepted.	eligible	Appeal accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
143	Asad Ullah	Purdil Khan	Professor of Zoology	Ineligible	2026-02-10	Regretted	The appellant requested that his degree be considered relevant to the field of Zoology based on supervision experience.	ineligible	Upheld the decision of the Scrutiny Committee, Ineligible.	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
144	Asad Ullah	Purdil Khan	Associate Professor of Veterinary Sciences (Veterinary Surgery)	Ineligible	2026-02-10	Regretted	The appellant requested eligibility, stating that during his DVM he completed coursework and training in veterinary surgery.	ineligible	Appeal cannot be considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
145	Dr. Shams Ul Hussain	shams Ul arifin	Associate Professor of Islamic Studies	Ineligible	2026-02-10	Regretted	The Appellate committee looked into his appeal and noted that his PhD title and thesis are in the field of Arabic which is not relevant to the advertised position. Thus, decision of the Scrutiny Committee is upheld.	ineligible	The Appellate committee looked into his appeal and noted that his PhD title and thesis are in the field of Arabic which is not relevant to the advertised position. Thus, decision of the Scrutiny Committee is upheld.	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
146	Mahrukh Shakir	Mian Shakir Ullah Jan	Professor of English	Eligible	2026-02-11	Accepted	Her claim for awarding her academic and distinction marks for Master of Arts at University of Southampton is invalid as it contributes to 18 years of education. Her claim for experience marks as Lecturer in Government Post-Graduate College Mardan from college fund is considered subject to verification from the Directorate.	eligible	Appeal for experience marks conditionally accepted subject to verification from the Directorate of Higher Education.	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
147	Mahrukh Shakir	Mian Shakir Ullah Jan	Associate Professor of English	Eligible	2026-02-11	Accepted	Her claim for awarding her academic and distinction marks for Master of Arts at University of Southampton is invalid as it contributes to 18 years of education. Her claim for experience marks as Lecturer in Government Post-Graduate College Mardan from college fund is considered subject to verification from the Directorate.	eligible	Appeal conditionally accepted subject to verification from the Directorate of Higher Education	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
148	Muhammad Younas	Muhammad Sultan	Assistant Professor of Biochemistry	Eligible	2026-02-11	Accepted	The articles "Genetic Structure and Linkage Disequilibrium..." published in Theoretical and Applied Genetics and "Molecular Characterization of Oilseed..." published in Molecular Biology Reports are both recognized as W category journals. Both appeals are accepted	eligible	Appeal accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
149	Wisal Ahmad	Noor Muhammad	Professor of Accounting and Finance	Eligible	2026-02-11	Accepted	Based on re-evaluation by Director QEC, 3 marks shall be added to him in the publications category.	eligible	Appeal accepted and 3 marks in publications awarded	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
150	MUHAMMAD IKRAM	UMAR SHAH	Assistant Professor of Pharmacy	Eligible	2026-02-11	Regretted	In accordance with the terms of the appeal, the committee did not agree to the appellant’s request to include a new document for quantification at this stage, thus the appeal is not accepted.	eligible	Appeal not accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
151	Dr Junaid Athar Khan	Muhammad Shaukat Javed	Professor of Human Resource Management	Ineligible	2026-02-11	Regretted	The appellant requested that his master’s credentials and the relevancy of his banking experience be considered toward the advertised position.	ineligible	The appellate committee considered his appeal and partially accepted his experience as Branch Manager w.e.f. June 7, 2011, to May 23, 2012 and Lecturer, City University July 17, 2007 to January 31, 2008, subject to verification. Thus, making his total experience as 14 Years, 10 Months, 7 Days. Thus, making him short of the required relevant experience	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
152	Dr Junaid Athar Khan	Muhammad Shaukat Javed	Associate Professor of Human Resource	Eligible	2026-02-11	Accepted	The appellate committee considered his appeal and partially accepted his experience as Branch Manager w.e.f. June 7, 2011, to May 23, 2012, and Lecturer, City University July 17, 2007, to January 31, 2008, subject to verification. Thus, making his total experience as 14 Years, 10 Months, 7 Days. His experience marks shall be rectified accordingly	eligible	Appeal parially accepted to the extent of experience marks	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
153	Muhammad Zubair	Sherab Gul	Associate Professor of Islamic Studies	Eligible	2026-02-11	Accepted	Based on re-verification by Director QEC, Articles mentioned at Serial No. 7, 17, & 18 are in Y category journal and Serial No. 14 of earlier publication, thus 4 marks shall be added to his publication marks	eligible	Based on re-verification by Director QEC, Articles mentioned at Serial No. 7, 17, & 18 are in Y category journal and Serial No. 14 of earlier publication, thus 4 marks shall be added to his publication marks	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
154	Shahid Ali Khan	Sabz Ali Khan	Assistant Professor of Chemistry	Eligible	2026-02-11	Accepted	Based on his appeal, he shall be awarded 2 marks for experience	eligible	Appeal provisionally accepted by awarding him experience marks	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
155	Muhammad Zubair	Sherab Gul	Professor of Islamic Studies	Eligible	2026-02-11	Accepted	Based on re-verification by Director QEC, Articles mentioned at Serial No. 7, 17, & 18 are in Y category journal and Serial No. 14 of earlier publication, thus 4 marks shall be added to his publication marks	eligible	Appeal accepted and 4 marks added to his publications	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
156	Sayyed Ibrahim Shah	Akram Shah	Assistant Professor of Pharmacy	Eligible	2026-02-11	Regretted	The claimed article is not recognized in HJRS 2022-23 – appeal cannot be considered.	eligible	Appeal not accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
157	Sumaira shams	shams ur rahman	Associate Professor of Zoology (Parasitology/Genetics)	Eligible	2026-02-11	Regretted	Her appeal for consideration of experience as Lecturer at Brains College was not accepted by the committee as the said experience does not qualify as valid experience as per advertised criteria. Based on re-evaluation by Director QEC, the publication marks awarded to her are correct.	eligible	Her appeal for consideration of experience as Lecturer at Brains College was not accepted by the committee as the said experience does not qualify as valid experience as per advertised criteria. Based on re-evaluation by Director QEC, the publication marks awarded to her are correct.	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
158	Dr. Muhammad Waqas	Gul Sahib Khan	Assistant Professor of Veterinary Sciences (Clinical Studies)	Eligible	2026-02-11	Regretted	In accordance with the terms of the appeal, the committee did not agree to the appellant’s request to include a new document for quantification at this stage, thus the appeal is not accepted.	eligible	Appeal cannot be considred	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
159	Sumaira shams	shams ur rahman	Professor of Zoology	Eligible	2026-02-11	Regretted	• Her appeal for consideration of experience as Lecturer at Brains College was not accepted by the committee as the said experience does not qualify as valid experience as per advertised criteria. • Based on re-evaluation by Director QEC, the publication marks awarded to her are correct.	eligible	Appeal not accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
160	Rafiq Nawab	Amir Nawab	Associate Professor of English	Eligible	2026-02-11	Regretted	As per re-evaluation by the Director QEC, the appeal cannot be accepted as per the HEC notification No. DD/SS&H/CDSSHP/Lambert/2015, dated: February 03, 2015 "All kind of publications in Lambert Academic Publishing would not be considered for grant of equivalency with research publications by Higher Education Commission Pakistan."	eligible	Appeal not accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
161	ATTAUR RAHMAN	nAMOOS KHAN	Associate Professor of Veterinary Sciences (Veterinary Anatomy)	Eligible	2026-02-11	Accepted	The committee evaluated the documents submitted with the appeal and found that as per letter of specialization dated April 1, 2025, his qualification is relevant to the advertised position. Regarding his claim for project marks, based on the attached document he shall be awarded 5.4 marks in project.	eligible	The committee evaluated the documents submitted with the appeal and found that as per letter of specialization dated April 1, 2025, his qualification is relevant to the advertised position. Regarding his claim for project marks, based on the attached document he shall be awarded 5.4 marks in project.	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
162	ATTAUR RAHMAN	nAMOOS KHAN	Assistant Professor of Veterinary Sciences (Basic Veterinary Sciences)	Eligible	2026-02-11	Accepted	• The committee evaluated the documents submitted with the appeal and found that as per letter of specialization dated April 1, 2025, his qualification is relevant to the advertised position. • Regarding his claim for project marks, based on the attached document he shall be awarding 5.4 marks in project.	eligible	Appeal accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
163	Muhammad Najmus Saqib	Zahid Ullah	Assistant Professor of Veterinary Sciences (Livestock)	Eligible	2026-02-11	Regretted	The appellant has not objected to his quantification but about other applicants’ eligibility	eligible	The appeal cannot be considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
164	Muhammad Ikram	Adalat Khan	Associate Professor of Pharmacy	Eligible	2026-02-11	Regretted	Both his experiences have already been considered as valid, and marks have been awarded to him., Furthermore, patent marks are not quantifiable as per the Statutes	eligible	Appeal cannot be considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
165	Alam Khan	Muhammad Akbar	Professor of Economics	Eligible	2026-02-11	Accepted	The academic marks are rectified subject to verification by Controller of Examinations, University of Peshawar	eligible	His claim for rectification of academic marks is provisionally accepted subject to verification from the office of Controller of Examinations of the concerned university	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
166	NIDA AMBREEN	Fateh Mohammad Khan	Professor of Chemistry	Ineligible	2026-02-11	Regretted	The appellant requested that a new article, not previously mentioned in her application form, be included.	ineligible	The paper claimed by the applicant was not submitted with her application. Hence her appeal is regretted, and the decision of the Scrutiny & Quantification remains intact.	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
167	Muhammad Rizwan	Muhammad Ramzan	Assistant Professor of Veterinary Sciences (Clinical Studies)	Eligible	2026-02-11	Accepted	• The applicant has provided appointment letter, the same shall be verified by the university concerned and marks shall be awarded accordingly. • The applicant’s claim regarding the article published in "Indus Journal of Bioscience Research" is regretted, as no supporting evidence was provided, and the journal is not recognized in HJRS 2023-24 based on the information submitted at the time of application.	eligible	Appeal parially accepted to the extent of expeirence	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
168	Silvia Ahmed Khattak	Israr Ahmed Khattak	Assistant Professor of Human Resource Management	Eligible	2026-02-11	Accepted	Her appeal for academic score rectification is accepted subject to verification from the office of Controller of Examinations. In accordance with the terms of the appeal, the committee did not agree to the appellant’s request to include a new document for quantification at this stage, thus the appeal is not accepted.	eligible	Her appeal for academic score rectification is provisionally accepted subject to verification from the office of Controller of Examinations. In accordance with the terms of the appeal, the committee did not agree to the appellant’s request to include a new document for quantification at this stage, thus the appeal is not accepted.	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
169	Silvia Ahmed Khattak	Israr Ahmed Khattak	Associate Professor of Human Resource	Eligible	2026-02-11	Accepted	Her appeal for academic score rectification is accepted subject to verification from the office of Controller of Examinations. In accordance with the terms of the appeal, the committee did not agree to the appellant’s request to include a new document for quantification at this stage, thus the appeal is not accepted.	eligible	Her appeal for academic score rectification is accepted subject to verification from the office of Controller of Examinations. In accordance with the terms of the appeal, the committee did not agree to the appellant’s request to include a new document for quantification at this stage, thus the appeal is not accepted.	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
170	Silvia Ahmed Khattak	Israr Ahmed Khattak	Professor of Human Resource Management	Eligible	2026-02-11	Accepted	Her appeal for academic score rectification is accepted subject to verification from the office of Controller of Examinations. In accordance with the terms of the appeal, the committee did not agree to the appellant’s request to include a new document for quantification at this stage, thus the appeal is not accepted.	eligible	Her appeal for academic score rectification is accepted subject to verification from the office of Controller of Examinations. In accordance with the terms of the appeal, the committee did not agree to the appellant’s request to include a new document for quantification at this stage, thus the appeal is not accepted.	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
171	Suleman	Roz Amin Khan	Assistant Professor of Zoology	Eligible	2026-02-11	Accepted	The Scrutiny Committee has awarded him 4 marks but same are not reflected in her merit, thus needs rectification	eligible	Appeal accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
172	Shah Hussain Awan	Mohammad Saleem Awan	Assistant Professor of Marketing and Entrepreneurship	Eligible	2026-02-11	Accepted	PCD Number provided	eligible	Appeal accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
173	Shah Hussain Awan	Mohammad Saleem Awan	Associate Professor of Marketing and Entrepreneurship	Eligible	2026-02-11	Accepted	The applicant provided the requisite verification from HEC, thus accepted	eligible	Appeal accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
174	Tayyaba Iftikhar	Iftikhar Ud Din	Assistant Professor of Pharmacy	Eligible	2026-02-11	Accepted	The applicant’s claim for the article published in "AAPS Pharm SciTech" is accepted. The journal is in X category, and the applicant had provided an incorrect journal title at the time of application.	eligible	Appeal partially accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
175	Muhammad Qayash Khan	Amir Nawas Khan	Associate Professor of Zoology (Fisheries)	Eligible	2026-02-11	Regretted	The committee noted that the project claimed does not qualify as valid research project as per the Statutes, thus marks cannot be awarded for it.	eligible	Appeal cannot be considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
176	Muhammad Qayash Khan	Amir Nawas Khan	Professor of Zoology	Eligible	2026-02-11	Regretted	The committee noted that the project claimed does not qualify as valid research project as per the Statutes, thus marks cannot be awarded for it.	eligible	Appeal not accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
177	Saghir Ahmad	Muhammad Umar	Assistant Professor of Medical Lab Technology (MLT)	Ineligible	2026-02-11	Regretted	The Appellate committee looked into his appeal and noted that his PhD is not relevant to Medical Lab Technology. Thus, decision of the Scrutiny Committee is upheld	ineligible	Irrelevant qualification	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
178	Saqib Bilal	Fazal Ahmad	Assistant Professor of Botany	Eligible	2026-02-11	Accepted	Given his attached experience, he shall be awarded 5 marks for experience and 10 marks for project	eligible	Appeal accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
179	Dr. Farkhanda Bibi	Amir Alam Khan	Assistant Professor of Botany	Eligible	2026-02-11	Accepted	• Her experience marks are not justified as the claimed experience does not qualify as valid experience as per HEC criteria. • The article "Comparative Performance of Diverse …" published in the journal Comparative Performance of Diverse is recognized in Y category – appeal accepted. The article "Allelopathic Effects of Aqueous …" is recognized in Y category – appeal accepted. Appeals regarding the articles "Alternate Substrates for the Growth …" and "Serological and Epidemiological …" cannot be considered	eligible	Appeal partially accepted to the extent of publications	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
180	Saqib Bilal	Fazal Ahmad	Associate Professor of Biotechnology	Eligible	2026-02-11	Accepted	His experience certificate is valid and his eligibility is confirmed. His project marks are revised as per attached documents with the appeal	eligible	Appeal accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
181	Saqib Bilal	Fazal Ahmad	Associate Professor of Botany	Eligible	2026-02-11	Accepted	His experience certificate is valid and his eligibility is confirmed. His project marks are awarded	eligible	His experience certificate is valid and his eligibility is confirmed. His project marks are awarded	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
182	Muhammad Naseer Abbas	Muhammad Naseer Abbas	Assistant Professor of Pharmacy	Eligible	2026-02-11	Regretted	The applicant’s appeal for one paper is regretted as the journal is not HEC-recognized and is not available in the WoS Master List online.	eligible	Appeal not considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
183	Muhammad Naseer Abbas	Muhammad Naseer Abbas	Associate Professor of Pharmacy	Eligible	2026-02-11	Regretted	• The applicant’s claim for the article published in Latin American Journal of Pharmacy is regretted. • The project is not claimed in actual application form	eligible	• The applicant’s claim for the article published in Latin American Journal of Pharmacy is regretted. • The project is not claimed in actual application form	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
184	Muhammad Hayat Khan	Sabir Khan	Assistant Professor of Islamic Studies	Eligible	2026-02-11	Accepted	The article published in "Journal of Positive School Psychology" is regretted as the new DoP provided by the applicant cannot be confirmed from any of the sources submitted. In the second article, the applicant requested a change of category from Z to Y; however, the Scrutiny Committee has already considered this article for marks/quantification, so no change in quantification is made.	eligible	Appeal is not accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
185	Zeeshan Anwar	Saeed Anwar	Assistant Professor of Pharmacy	Eligible	2026-02-11	Regretted	There is no provision of Post-Doc marks in the Statutes	eligible	The Statutes have no provision for award of post-Doc marks; thus, his appeal cannot be considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
186	Salahud Din	Faridoon	Associate Professor of Veterinary Sciences (Veterinary Anatomy)	Eligible	2026-02-11	Regretted	The appeal for inclusion of new document was not accepted by the Appellate Committee	eligible	Appela cannot be considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
187	Junaid Akbar	Muhammad Akbar	Professor of Islamic Studies	Eligible	2026-02-12	Regretted	He has been made eligible with post-PhD experience and marks are also awarded accordingly, whereas the experience claimed in appeal is Pre-PhD. The project claimed does not qualify research project marks. Thus, his quantification remains unchanged	eligible	Appeal on quantification cannot be accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
188	Ikram Ullah	Zahir Shah	Assistant Professor of Food Science Technology	Eligible	2026-02-12	Accepted	Based on the experience certificate provided with the appeal, he shall be awarded 10 marks for experience. Furthermore, new documents cannot be added at this stage	eligible	Appeal partially accepted to the extent of experience marks	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
189	Jalil Ur Rehman	Toti Rehman	Assistant Professor of Microbiology	Eligible	2026-02-12	Regretted	In accordance with the terms of the appeal, the committee did not agree to the appellant’s request to include a new document for quantification at this stage, thus the appeal is not accepted.	eligible	Appeal cannot be accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
190	shahid anwar	taj umar	Lecturer in Pharmacy	Eligible	2026-02-12	Regretted	--	--	--	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
191	Imran Khan	Shah Zarin	Associate Professor of Biotechnology	Eligible	2026-02-12	Regretted	His claim for project marks rectification based on current currency rate is not justified, the marks awarded to him are correct	eligible	Appeal not accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
192	Rabia Attas	Muhammad Attas	Professor of Economics	Eligible	2026-02-12	Accepted	• Since she has provided official letter from office of Controller, her academic percentage be revised. • Her experience has also been verified thus her marks of experience shall be added. • Based on report of Director QEC, her publication marks shall be increased by 3.	eligible	Appeal accepted, marks of academics, experience and publications revised	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
193	Dr Alam Zeb Khan	Mir Sharaf Khan	Professor of Veterinary Sciences (Medicine)	Ineligible	2026-02-12	Regretted	The candidate submitted a paper for consideration that was re-evaluated; however, it does not justify the claim of the candidate.	ineligible	The paper provided by the candidate is re-evaluated which doesn’t justify the claim of the candidate. Hence his appeal is regretted, and the decision of the Scrutiny & Quantification remains intact.	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
194	Muhammad Shahkar Uzair	Amir Zaman	Assistant Professor of Veterinary Sciences (Livestock)	Eligible	2026-02-12	Regretted	The experience claimed is working as Research Associate in a NRPU Research project, which doesn’t qualify as valid experience as per the advertised criteria	eligible	Appeal cannot be considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
195	Sana Ullah	abdul qayyum khan	Associate Professor of Zoology (Fisheries)	Eligible	2026-02-12	Regretted	He has claimed a total of 5 years post-PhD experience, which makes him eligible. Thus, no additional marks can be given	eligible	Appeal not accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
196	Hamid Khan	Hastam Khan	Assistant Professor of Medical Lab Technology (MLT)	Ineligible	2026-02-12	Regretted	The Appellate committee looked into his appeal and noted that his PhD is not relevant to Medical Lab Technology. Thus, decision of the Scrutiny Committee is upheld	ineligible	Irrelevant qualification	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
197	Abdul Samad Shabbir	Ghulam Shabbir	Assistant Professor of Textile	Ineligible	2026-02-12	Regretted	The Appellate committee looked into his appeal and noted that his BS is in Textile Engineering. Thus, decision of the Scrutiny Committee is upheld	ineligible	Irrelevant qualification	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
198	Dr. Shafiq Ur Rahman	Abdul Halim	Associate Professor of Pharmacy	Eligible	2026-02-12	Regretted	His appeal for being declared eligible on the basis of post-PhD experience while also seeking additional marks for pre-PhD experience was discussed in detail by the Appellate Committee. The Committee, as a matter of principle, decided that the same category of experience used to determine eligibility shall be considered for the award of experience marks to ensure uniformity and avoid counting different categories of experience separately. Accordingly, the marks awarded to him under the experience category were found to be correct.	eligible	Appeal cannot be considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
199	Yasir Ali	Saleem Ur Rahman	Assistant Professor of Biochemistry	Ineligible	2026-02-12	Regretted	The Appellate Committee looked into his appeal and noted that the terminal qualification of the appellant is not relevant to the advertised position. Thus, the decision of Scrutiny Committee is upheld	ineligible	Irrelevant qualification	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
200	Saira Shams	Shams-ur-Rahman	Assistant Professor of Biochemistry	Eligible	2026-02-12	Accepted	• The certificate attached with the appeal does not qualify as distinction and experience marks have been already awarded for experience claimed. • Inclusion of new experience certificate cannot be considered. • The article "SERUM PROTEIN PROFILE..." published in African Journal of Traditional Complementary and Alternative Medicines is recognized as a W category journal. The appeal is accepted.	eligible	Appeal accepted to the extent of the appeals	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
201	Arif Hussain	Sumer Gul	Professor of Accounting and Finance	Eligible	2026-02-12	Accepted	His experience claimed at Northern University has been verified; thus his experience marks shall be increased by 1. Since he provided completion certificate of the research project, thus accepted.	eligible	Appeal accepted and experience mark added.	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
202	Noor Jehan	Musa Khan	Professor of Economics	Eligible	2026-02-12	Regretted	The applicant claim for additional experience marks is not accepted as the claimed experience does not qualify as valid teaching experience as per the advertised criteria. For award of project marks, the applicant shall provide completion certificate of both projects.	eligible	Appeal not considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
203	ATTAUR RAHMAN	nAMOOS KHAN	Assistant Professor of Medical Lab Technology (MLT)	Ineligible	2026-02-12	Regretted	The Appellate committee looked into his appeal and noted that his PhD is not relevant to Medical Lab Technology. Thus, decision of the Scrutiny Committee is upheld	ineligible	Irrelevant qualification	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
204	ghayyur qadir	Noor Qadir	Associate Professor of Marketing and Entrepreneurship	Eligible	2026-02-12	Accepted	• His claim for additional experience marks for experience claimed at NCS was not acceded to by the committee as the same does not qualify as valid experience as per advertised criteria. • The appeal regarding the paper is accepted; the actual date of publication is December 2024 as per the PDF copy of the article submitted with the application, and the journal is recognized in Y category (National Journal List 2024–2025).	eligible	His appeal is partially accepted to the extent of publications	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
205	shahid Ahmad	Muhammad zada	Assistant Professor of Zoology	Eligible	2026-02-12	Accepted	• Since the appellant provided valid experience certificate for experience claimed, 2 marks shall be added to his experience He did not mention publications in his application form thus inclusion of new document at this stage is not accepted	eligible	Partially accepted by awarding experience marks.	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
206	Tayyaba Iftikhar	Iftikhar Ud Din	Associate Professor of Pharmacy	Eligible	2026-02-12	Accepted	• The claim to add new experience was not accepted by the committee. • The applicant’s claim for the article published in AAPS PharmSciTech is accepted. The journal is X category, and the applicant had provided an incorrect journal title at the time of application.	eligible	• The claim to add new experience was not accepted by the committee. • The applicant’s claim for the article published in AAPS PharmSciTech is accepted. The journal is X category, and the applicant had provided an incorrect journal title at the time of application. • The claim to add new experience was not accepted by the committee. • The applicant’s claim for the article published in AAPS PharmSciTech is accepted. The journal is X category, and the applicant had provided an incorrect journal title at the time of application. Her appeal regarding publication is accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
207	Asfand yar	Muhammad Seyar	Assistant Professor of Textile	Eligible	2026-02-12	Accepted	Appeal referred to Scrutiny Committee for evaluation of marks for exhibitions claimed	eligible	Appeal referred to Scrutiny Committee for evaluation of exhibitions claimed	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
208	Liaqat Iqbal	Fazal Majeed	Professor of English	Ineligible	2026-02-12	Regretted	The committee after thorough review partially accepted the appeal (Experience mentioned at Serial No. 5 of 1year and 1 months has been counted). However the overall experience is less than the required experience after the inclusion of above.	ineligible	The committee after thorough review partially accepted the appeal (Experience mentioned at Serial No. 5 of 1year and 1 months has been counted). However the overall experience is less than the required experience after the inclusion of above.	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
209	Dr Saira Farman	farman Ullah	Associate Professor of Biochemistry	Eligible	2026-02-12	Accepted	The appeal regarding the article “Archives of Medical Sciences” is accepted; the author is the corresponding author, and the journal is W category. The author had entered an incorrect journal title and date of publication at the time of application. The correct title is “Archives of Medical Science,” and the actual date of publication is 12-12-2022, as per the PDF file and link provided with the application. The appeal regarding the article “Statistical Modeling for COVID-19” is not accepted, as the applicant submitted incomplete and irrelevant evidence; the journal is delisted from the WoS Master List with the remark “Editorial De-listing.” The appeal regarding the article “Anticancer Insights of Phyla” is not accepted, as the journal is published in 2025, and the previous HJRS 2024 list is not applicable.	eligible	The appeal regarding the article “Archives of Medical Sciences” is accepted; the author is the corresponding author, and the journal is W category. The author had entered an incorrect journal title and date of publication at the time of application. The correct title is “Archives of Medical Science,” and the actual date of publication is 12-12-2022, as per the PDF file and link provided with the application. The appeal regarding the article “Statistical Modeling for COVID-19” is not accepted, as the applicant submitted incomplete and irrelevant evidence; the journal is delisted from the WoS Master List with the remark “Editorial De-listing.” The appeal regarding the article “Anticancer Insights of Phyla” is not accepted, as the journal is published in 2025, and the previous HJRS 2024 list is not applicable.	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
210	Dr Saira Farman	farman Ullah	Assistant Professor of Biochemistry	Eligible	2026-02-12	Regretted	The applicant has got maximum 15 marks in publications	eligible	Appeal cannot be considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
211	Sohail Anwar	Inayat Ullah	Associate Professor of Islamic Studies	Eligible	2026-02-12	Accepted	Claim 1 (DoP July–Dec 2022, Y journal) accepted based on PDF and editor email; Claim 2 (DoP July–Dec 2016, Z journal) accepted based on PDF; Claim 3 (DoP 2015, Z journal, IDOR policy) accepted based on PDF; Claim 4 not accepted as DoP cannot be verified from PDF, appeal evidence, or link.	eligible	Claim 1 (DoP July–Dec 2022, Y journal) accepted based on PDF and editor email; Claim 2 (DoP July–Dec 2016, Z journal) accepted based on PDF; Claim 3 (DoP 2015, Z journal, IDOR policy) accepted based on PDF; Claim 4 not accepted as DoP cannot be verified from PDF, appeal evidence, or link.	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
212	Ghazala Nawaz	Gul Nawaz Khan	Associate Professor of Botany	Eligible	2026-02-12	Accepted	• The project marks of 0.7 shall be added after submission of completion certificate. • The applicant appealed for the paper listed at S.No. 18 in the application form. The journal is in the W category, and the appeal is accepted.	eligible	• The project marks of 0.7 shall be added after submission of completion certificate. • The applicant appealed for the paper listed at S.No. 18 in the application form. The journal is in the W category, and the appeal is accepted.	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
213	SANAN AHMAD	SARDAR AHMAD	Assistant Professor of Architecture	Eligible	2026-02-12	Accepted	Appeal referred to Scrutiny Committee for evaluation of exhibitions claimed	eligible	Appeal referred to Scrutiny Committee for evaluation of exhibitions claimed	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
214	Dr. Azmat Ali Shah	Faqir Muhammad	Assistant Professor of Human Resource Management	Ineligible	2026-02-12	Accepted	The Appellate Committee looked into his appeal and noted that the terminal qualification of the appellant is in HRM, which is relevant to the advertised position. Thus, his appeal is accepted, and the case is referred to Scrutiny Committee for quantification	eligible	Appeal accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
215	Abdul Majid	Sultan Muhammad	Assistant Professor of Zoology	Eligible	2026-02-12	Regretted	The appeal for inclusion of new document was not accepted by the Appellate Committee	eligible	Appeal not accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
216	Abdul Majid	Sultan Muhammad	Associate Professor of Zoology (Parasitology/Genetics)	Eligible	2026-02-12	Regretted	The publication mentioned in the appeal is not enlisted in his application form, thus his request for addition of new document is not accepted.	eligible	Appeal cannot be considered	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
217	Sayyed Ibrahim Shah	Akram Shah	Associate Professor of Pharmacy	Ineligible	2026-02-12	Regretted	Based on the discussion reflected above, it is noted that the documents now being presented were not part of the record at the time the case was examined by the Scrutiny Committee. As clearly stated in the terms and conditions of appeal, “Appeals shall be justified only on the basis of documents already submitted at the time of application. Candidates are strictly advised not to submit any new documents during the appeal process.” Since the scrutiny process is conducted on the basis of the record available at the prescribed time, the inclusion of additional documents at this stage cannot be entertained. Accordingly, the decision of the Scrutiny Committee is upheld.	ineligible	Short of required relevant experience	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
218	Raza Ur Rahman	Lutf Ur Rahman	Assistant Professor of Marketing and Entrepreneurship	Eligible	2026-02-12	Accepted	The article "The Role of Social Entrepreneurship..." published in JBT in June 2018 is recognized in Z category based on IDOR policy. Appeal accepted.	eligible	Appeal accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
219	Nida Andaleeb khattak	Abdul Jabbar Khattak	Assistant Professor of Textile	Eligible	2026-02-12	Accepted	Appeal partially accepted by granting 1 additional marks for publications. Furthermore, appeal regarding marks for exhibition claimed is referred to Scrutiny Committee for evaluation	eligible	Appeal partially accepted by granting 1 additional marks for publications. Furthermore, appeal regarding marks for exhibition claimed is referred to Scrutiny Committee for evaluation	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
220	ABDUS SAMAD	Umer Hayat	Professor of English	Ineligible	2026-02-12	Accepted	The appellate committee thoroughly reviewed the case and based on the HEC equivalency, marked him “Eligible” and referred the case to Scrutiny & Quantification Committee for quantification	eligible	The appellate committee thoroughly reviewed the case and based on the HEC equivalency, marked him “Eligible” and referred the case to Scrutiny & Quantification Committee for quantification	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
221	Shehzad Khan	Alamzeb	Professor of Accounting and Finance	Eligible	2026-02-12	Accepted	The claim of rectification in academic score is conditionally accepted, subject to verification by the Office of the Controller of Examinations of the respective university. The appellant provided a valid experience certificate from JS Bank, which has been duly verified; thus, the experience is provisionally accepted, subject to confirmation of the employee’s grade/level from the concerned bank within a week’s time.	eligible	The claim of rectification in academic score is conditionally accepted, subject to verification by the Office of the Controller of Examinations of the respective university. The appellant provided a valid experience certificate from JS Bank, which has been duly verified; thus, the experience is provisionally accepted, subject to confirmation of the employee’s grade/level from the concerned bank within a week’s time.	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
222	Luqman Khan	Nasrullah Khan	Assistant Professor of Zoology	Eligible	2026-02-12	Accepted	Since the appellant provided valid experience certificate for experience claimed, 2 marks shall be added to his experience	eligible	Appeal accepted	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
223	GHAZALA JAMSHED	Jamshed Khan	Lecturer in English	Eligible	2026-02-13	Regretted	--	--	--	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
224	Adil khaliq	Fazli khaliq	Lecturer in Pharmacy	Eligible	2026-02-15	Regretted	--	--	--	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
225	Sonia Salam	dar us Salam	Lecturer in English	Ineligible	2026-02-15	Regretted	Since the applicant did not provide MS in her application form, thus decision of the Scrutiny Committee stands	ineligible	Since the applicant did not provide MS in her application form, thus decision of the Scrutiny Committee stands	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
226	Muhammad Hussain Damsaz	Raj Wali Shah Khattak	Lecturer in English	Ineligible	2026-02-17	Regretted	Since the applicant did not provide any valid age relaxation certificate, thus decision of the Scrutiny Committee stands	ineligible	Since the applicant did not provide any valid age relaxation certificate, thus decision of the Scrutiny Committee stands	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
227	Muhammad Faheem	Nawshad Wali	Lecturer in Pharmacy	Eligible	2026-02-18	Accepted	The appellant is regular employee of University of Swabi thus eligible for screening test	eligible	The appellant is regular employee of University of Swabi thus eligible for screening test	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
228	Huma ghani	fazal ghani	Lecturer in Pharmacy	Ineligible	2026-02-18	Regretted	Since her application form is incomplete, the decision of scrutiny committee stands	ineligible	Since her application form is incomplete, the decision of scrutiny committee stands	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
229	DR. FAZLI HADI	GHULAM RABBANI	Lecturer in Pharmacy	Eligible	2026-02-18	Regretted	--	--	--	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
230	Navees Muhammad	Yar Muhammad	Lecturer in Pharmacy	Ineligible	2026-02-18	Regretted	Since the applicant did not provide any valid age relaxation certificate, thus decision of the Scrutiny Committee stands, and the applicant is declared as “Ineligible”.	ineligible	Since the applicant did not provide any valid age relaxation certificate, thus decision of the Scrutiny Committee stands, and the applicant is declared as “Ineligible”.	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
231	Muhammad Wasim Khan	Abdur Rahman	Lecturer in English	Eligible	2026-02-19	Accepted	Degree provided, thus eligible for screening test	eligible	Degree provided, thus eligible for screening test	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
232	Dr. Shakir Ullah	Noor Hani Gul	Lecturer in English	Eligible	2026-02-20	Accepted	Accepted subject to fulfillment of deficiencies	eligible	Accepted subject to fulfillment of deficiencies	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
233	Shah Khalid	Zaman Khan	Lecturer in English	Ineligible	2026-02-20	Accepted	Since the applicant has provided age relaxation certificate, the applicant is provisionally eligible for Test subject to verification from the relevant authorities	eligible	Since the applicant has provided age relaxation certificate, the applicant is provisionally eligible for Test subject to verification from the relevant authorities	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
234	SAMA SAREER`	SAREER AHMAD	Lecturer in English	Ineligible	2026-02-21	Regretted	The appellate committee noted that the appellant has not mentioned any credentials in her application, thus the decision of Scrutiny Committee stands	ineligible	The appellate committee noted that the appellant has not mentioned any credentials in her application, thus the decision of Scrutiny Committee stands	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
235	Mahwish	Muhammad Humayun	Lecturer in Pharmacy	Ineligible	2026-02-23	Accepted	Since she is one year above the eligibility age, she may be provisionally allowed to age subject to age relaxation by the Syndicate.	eligible	Since she is one year above the eligibility age, she may be provisionally allowed to age subject to age relaxation by the Syndicate.	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)
236	MUHAMMAD AMJED	SHEREEN SHAH	Lecturer in Food Science Technology	Eligible	2026-02-27	Accepted	Based on the documents provided with the appeal, the appellant is provisionally eligible for screening test	eligible	Based on the documents provided with the appeal, the appellant is provisionally eligible for screening test	Proceed for Appellate Decision Statement (if required)